Google Chrome: Future Nostalgia

1 September 2011 | By Michael
Future Nostalgia

Google Chrome’s ‘The web is what you make of it’ campaign plays with the conventional semiotics of time to communicate its enduring value. The ‘Dear Hollie’ spot is perhaps the clearest example of this.

The ad seamlessly blends two usually separated themes: nostalgia and modernity. “Dad” sets up an email address,, and begins sending newborn daughter Hollie emails including pictures and video of her development over a seven-year period.

Google Chrome, Dear Hollie

By imagining future Dad looking back to a present that is constantly evolving, the ad plays with time, showing Gmail as part of the (sentimental) past, the (immediate) present and the (nostalgic) future. In the real world, the present day is by definition not nostalgic, and symbols of modernity like email and social networking have little power to move us in the way birthday candles and baby photos can – symbols not only of the past but of our childhoods. By combining the two sets of codes, Google is charging its present-day product with nostalgic emotional power.

The ad also uses a third temporal perspective, by bringing together a series of moments from a long time period into a very short spot. In doing so, it codes online communication – and Google – not as transient or disposable, but as cumulative and durable. It implies Google is here to stay, a brand beyond time.

Watch the full ad at

One Comment

  1. Russ
    Posted 14 September 2012 at 9.19 pm | Permalink

    Structuralism and semiotics need contrast and a class system, and what better concept than value to apply to this. Something as trivial as a pair of shoes or important as what I do with my time. Time is continuous and there is no getting it back, so it is immensely valuable, to some. The value of my time is the most important thing to me right now, so am I going to waste two hours of it in a club on a Saturday night or invest it in my Norton Anthology to prepare for a Brit Lit exam? I wasted it of course (had a BALL), but when that choice rears its head again, I may make a better decision by considering what the value of the options are, and for me to do that means I’m understanding structuralism and semiotics a little better that I thought.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *


Popular tags...

semiotics UK news advertising fashion consumption talk consumers design Christmas branding retail politics digital awards humans pets post-feminist film google government publishing jewellery global masculinity Lynx sonic semiotics packaging tobacco branding adapting innovation Australia trademark logo Jesus food eating Unilever business seminar chauvinism irony Yorkie failure failing success Judith Halberstam Tim Harford corporate culture Kathryn Schulz